![]() Yes, the single-core result of an M2 MacBook Pro will beat any M1 device that’s because this is an A15-based core, and therefore it’s faster. It has increased performance in 4K video encoding and decoding and supports faster LP5 memory-and that memory can be a little denser, allowing the maximum RAM of the M2 to be 24GB, up from 16GB on the M1.Īll the tests I could run on the M2 MacBook Pro bore this story out. The M2 also includes some features that previously existed only on the higher-end members of the M1 chip family. Reviewers found the same when running a variety of tests. Single-core performance with the M2 is around 11.56% faster than the M1 chip, while multi-core performance is up by around 19.45%. The benchmarks show that the M2 chip in the MacBook Pro clocks in at 3.49Hz compared to the M1’s speed of 3.2GHz. AnandTech and Macworld each used Apple’s own claims to predict what kind of performance we should expect from the M2 chip, and benchmark tests confirmed these expectations. We first revealed back in March that Apple would be launching new MacBook Pro and MacBook Air models with an M2 chip. These confirmed Apple’s claims in terms of improvements over the base M1 chip, but also confirmed that, as expected, the M1 Pro, Max, and Ultra chips still leave the M2 in the dust.Ī new comparison table shows how the M2 speed compares to every other recent Apple Silicon chip, from the A13 Bionic in the iPhone 11, through to the M1 Ultra – and it makes for interesting viewing … Background The M2 Max is also playable at 2024 x 1964 at 34 fps.It wasn’t long after the new(ish) MacBook Pro went on sale that we got to see some M2 speed benchmarks. Keep in mind that this is an older game, and not one designed for Apple Silicon or Metal. In Rise of the Tomb Raider, the Max shows its might with the highest frame rate at 1920 x 1200. Of course, battery life is going to depend on what you're doing with the device. On battery life, it appears the M2 Pro-based machine is on par with the 2021 model, while the M2 Max machine took a surprising dive. We're hoping to get our hands on the hardware soon to see what we can learn about it. It's also possible that, because the M2 Max has so much going on on the chip, it may have been hampered slightly in multi-core when those GPU cores weren't being used. While the M2 Max's 64GB of RAM should be helping a bit, these may be within standard error. My thoughts are that these scores are pretty close, and Apple should be using the same CPU cores here. ![]() I was initially surprised to see that these chips produced the scores they did in Geekbench 5, with the M2 Pro slightly ahead of the M2 Max. The other big difference is the GPU: The M2 Pro has a 19-core GPU, while the M2 Max has a 38-core GPU. The two CPUs both have 12 cores, but the M2 Pro has 32GB of RAM and the M2 Max has 64GB. The performance scores those sites have published are fascinating. MacBook Pro 14-inch, M1 Pro, (8-core CPU, 14-core GPU, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD) MacBook Pro 16-inch, M1 Max (10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) MacBook Pro 14-inch M2 Max (12-core CPU, 38-core GPU, 64GB RAM, 2TB of SSD) MacBook Pro 14-inch, M2 Pro (12-core CPU, 19-core GPU, 32GB RAM, 2TB SSD) We've collated some scores from our sister sites Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide, as well as some of our prior review data on the 2021 models. It starts with a 12-core CPU and 30-core GPU, and the upgrade nets you a 38-core GPU. The M2 Max is only in the laptops: the 14 and 16-inch MacBook Pros. Some reviewers saw the M2 Pro in the laptop, while others saw it in the Mac Mini. The 16-core neural engine is the same across both chips. The base model has a 10-core CPU and 16-core GPU, but most of the reviews out there have a step up: the full 12-core CPU and 19-core GPU. The M2 Pro can be found in all three of Apple's new computers: the Mac Mini, 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros. The general consensus seems to be that the new chips bring some solid performance upgrades, especially for those looking to upgrade from older Intel-based systems. That's not to say the new system's designs aren't important - I own an M1 Pro MacBook Pro and like it very much, minus the notch - but we're focusing on what's been changed and improved. We're particularly interested in two things: performance and battery life. While we still hope to get our hands on the new processors to run them through their paces, we're pouring over the existing results to see what reviewers think of the new chips. The design of the machines are effectively the same (minus some port changes on the Mac Mini), so the big changes are all in the silicon. ![]() The first reviews of Apple's refreshed MacBook Pro and Mac Mini are here, and, with them, we're getting to see impressions of Apple's new M2 Pro and M2 Max processors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |